![]() |
![]() |
Non-collapsing vs Collapsing BGA Balls |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
tatets ![]() Active User ![]() Joined: 22 Jul 2013 Status: Offline Points: 29 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 10 Jun 2015 at 8:30pm |
Hi,
Looking at the tables below, for non-collapsing we use 0.25 (or less) nominal land diameter for 0.50mm pitch packages. Question is, should 0.30-0.75 ball diameter still applicable for 0.500 pitch packages? Will the land pads not cause any bridging due to space constraints? Similary, for collapsing we use 0.30 (or higher) nominal land diameter for 0.65mm pitch packages. Question is, should 0.15-0.25 ball diameter still applicable for 0.65 pitch packages? Will the land pads not cause any reliability issues due to smaller pads? Thanks in advance for your help. Collapsing Ball ![]() Non-collapsing ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Tom H ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 5750 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Question is, should 0.30-0.75 ball diameter still applicable for 0.500 pitch packages?
Question is, should 0.15-0.25 ball diameter still applicable for 0.65 pitch packages? Here is the Ball Size to Pin Pitch table from IPC-7351B: ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
tatets ![]() Active User ![]() Joined: 22 Jul 2013 Status: Offline Points: 29 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks a million Tom!
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |