Pins too tight |
Post Reply |
Author | |
budnoel
Active User Joined: 16 Mar 2012 Status: Offline Points: 17 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 12 Nov 2012 at 12:47pm |
uploads/45/Connector.jpg
Hello. Using IPC density level C (Least) for the padstacks associated with pins 13-16 of the enclosed connector footprint I find less the 5mils of clearance between pads. (4.8mils) I had to make the pad even smaller than what Level C recommended (c140h90) Any comments?
|
|
DaveCowl
Advanced User Joined: 18 Oct 2012 Location: Santa Clara, CA Status: Offline Points: 161 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
You are not alone. I have a similar issue with a mini DisplayPort connector. You can't space 1mm pads 1mm apart. I don't have a good answer for this problem but think that pad clearance is probably more important than annular ring...?!
|
|
Tom H
Admin Group Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 5718 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Whenever the pin pitch and the hole size conflict with the design rules, I use an oblong pad shape with a minimum pad on the sides and accept drill breakout on the sides (if it happens).
I never had any manufacturing problems when using this technique. Sometimes you have to think outside the box. We'll have to introduce this pad shape to the through-hole calculator in V2013. |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |