Solder Mask On 0.40 Pitch QFN

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

   Hello,
I am working on a footprint for a QFN package (component MPN is ICM-20948) which has 0.4mm pitch and I'm not sure how to design the solder mask for this footprint. 

I saw some examples online where for QFNs of 400um pitch it was advised to use solder mask trench around the pads since it might be hard for the manufacturer to place solder mask between pads (minimum webbing of 100um in my case). 

Still, I would like to have solder mask between pads to help avoid solder bridges and I thought that I could use the nominal lead width instead of the maximum lead width to use for my footprint. 

I will use 50um solder mask clearance in my design. My idea is to use the nominal pad width (200um) + 2x50um of solder mask clearance leaving me with 100um for the solder mask webbing.

My question is if it is too risky to use the nominal width of 200um instead of the maximum 250um but have the benefit of solder mask between pads?

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
ArtCym Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List New User Joined: 25 May 2022 Status: Offline Points: 4	Post Options Post Reply Quote ArtCym Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Topic: Solder Mask On 0.40 Pitch QFN Posted: 25 May 2022 at 4:59am
	Hello, I am working on a footprint for a QFN package (component MPN is ICM-20948) which has 0.4mm pitch and I'm not sure how to design the solder mask for this footprint. I saw some examples online where for QFNs of 400um pitch it was advised to use solder mask trench around the pads since it might be hard for the manufacturer to place solder mask between pads (minimum webbing of 100um in my case). Still, I would like to have solder mask between pads to help avoid solder bridges and I thought that I could use the nominal lead width instead of the maximum lead width to use for my footprint. I will use 50um solder mask clearance in my design. My idea is to use the nominal pad width (200um) + 2x50um of solder mask clearance leaving me with 100um for the solder mask webbing. My question is if it is too risky to use the nominal width of 200um instead of the maximum 250um but have the benefit of solder mask between pads?



Tom H Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Admin Group Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 5718	Post Options Post Reply Quote Tom H Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 25 May 2022 at 9:34am
	The Fabrication shop will automatically Gang Mask the entire row of pads on all 0.40 mm pitch packages.
	Stay connected - follow us! X - LinkedIn

feynman Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Active User Joined: 06 Feb 2020 Status: Offline Points: 12	Post Options Post Reply Quote feynman Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 27 May 2022 at 2:10pm
	You could simply make the solder mask openings 1:1 land size and leave the manufacturer the option for resizing according to their capabilities (in your fabrication notes). The big question here is if 50 um of solder mask clearance is enough for your manufacturer's capabilities. You should definitely ask them about that. Try being as specific as possible when you ask ("Can you leave solder mask between the pads of THIS footprint or will you gang mask it?"). If they say they can do this you might want to explicitly call out in your final data to not gang mask, nevertheless. Because sometimes manufacturers can, but don't want to :) If they need more clearance than 50 um for the solder mask they will very likely Gang Mask it like Tom said.