Square pads standard?
Printed From: PCB Libraries Forum
Category: General
Forum Name: General Discussion
Forum Description: general topics not related to other forums
URL: https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3155
Printed Date: 25 Nov 2024 at 1:09am
Topic: Square pads standard?
Posted By: BertX
Subject: Square pads standard?
Date Posted: 18 Aug 2022 at 1:40am
|
I have been looking for this for a while now. Opinions seem to be divided on this. But does the IPC say anything on the use of square pads? I was always taught at school it denotes the positive lead or pin 1. So that would mean the anode of a diode or capacitor, but it seems most use it to indicate the cathode. So is there a standard for this? |
Replies:
Posted By: Tom H
Date Posted: 18 Aug 2022 at 8:18am
|
IPC has no guidelines for using Square Pad Shape to indicate Pin 1 for through-hole footprints. It started back in the 1970's with Bishop Graphic decals for DIP14's for hand taping and just migrated into CAD in the 1980's. 50 years ago silkscreen was rare so we used copper shapes to indicate Pin 1. It's a defacto standard that is totally up to the end user to define how they want to indicate the location of Pin 1. ------------- Stay connected - follow us! https://twitter.com/PCBLibraries" rel="nofollow - X - http://www.linkedin.com/company/pcb-libraries-inc-/" rel="nofollow - LinkedIn |
Posted By: BertX
Date Posted: 18 Aug 2022 at 10:24am
| Thank you. If I may ask, does the standard say how to mark anodes/cathodes or is this also up to the user? |
Posted By: Tom H
Date Posted: 18 Aug 2022 at 11:04am
|
Anode/Cathode polarity markings are defined by each PCB designer in cooperation with their assembly shops recommendations. Assembly shops should have their own DFA (Design for Assembly) handbook, but it may not contain polarity marking guidelines. There are some recommendations coming from IPC-7352 which should be released by the end of the year. ------------- Stay connected - follow us! https://twitter.com/PCBLibraries" rel="nofollow - X - http://www.linkedin.com/company/pcb-libraries-inc-/" rel="nofollow - LinkedIn |
Posted By: feynman
Date Posted: 18 Aug 2022 at 12:19pm
|
Diodes are a real pain in the ass for assemblers. Diode orientation should be made ridiculously clear: - Draw a diode symbol or a triangle on the silkscreen (if possible). - Draw a diode symbol on your assembly drawing. - Name the pins "A" and "C" instead of "+", "-", "1" or "2". If something can be remotely considered "industry standard" with diodes than it's the cathode being the "special" pin that is marked one way or the other. |
Posted By: Tom H
Date Posted: 18 Aug 2022 at 12:26pm
|
For Diodes, the package polarity is normally on the Cathode. For LEDs, the package polarity is normally on the Anode. Footprint Expert allows the user to manually insert polarity markings that stay save in the FPX library. Here are some of the shapes and the user defines the size, location, shape, rotation and layer.  ------------- Stay connected - follow us! https://twitter.com/PCBLibraries" rel="nofollow - X - http://www.linkedin.com/company/pcb-libraries-inc-/" rel="nofollow - LinkedIn |
Posted By: mhike08
Date Posted: 03 Nov 2022 at 6:04pm
|
In relation to the topic, I would like to ask if there is a disadvantages of using square pad in terms of manufacturing and solderability? And also for clearance and creepage? Thanks for the response.
|
Posted By: williamswelsh75
Date Posted: 19 May 2023 at 11:43pm
|
I completely agree that square pads should be the standard. They provide a much more comfortable and ergonomic experience for users than standard round pads. Plus, they are much more durable and last longer since there are no exposed wires. All in all, I think square pads should be the go-to option for most people.
|