![]() |
![]() |
Max Height in Footprint Naming Convention |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
m.elsayed ![]() Advanced User ![]() Joined: 22 Sep 2016 Status: Offline Points: 63 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 12 hours 46 minutes ago at 12:00am |
I have noticed the footprint naming convention uses the max height.
However this not mentioned in document "IPC-7351B & IPC-7352 Footprint Naming Convention" Example:
BGA27C100P3X9_900X300X143 Please add more details |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Tom H ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 5860 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Max Height is intended for the 3D STEP model.
The majority or Footprint Expert users have the 3D STEP feature and all of them requested Max Height. We deliver what the electronics industry wants. We're sorry that we didn't mention this in the IPC-7351 publication. |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |