|
|
Why do footprint names indicate transistor vs IC? |
Post Reply 
|
| Author | |
adevries 
Active User 
Joined: 06 Dec 2019 Status: Offline Points: 16 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(1)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: Why do footprint names indicate transistor vs IC?Posted: 22 Sep 2020 at 5:52pm |
|
Hello,
I've been looking through the Library Expert Pro 2020 software, as well as the Land Pattern Naming Convention, and I noticed that some footprints make a distinction when it comes to the function of the part. For example, there is no generic small outline flat lead (SOFL) footprint. If the part is an IC, the name starts with "ICSOFL", if the part is a transistor, the name instead starts with "TRXSOFL". Why does the name change depending on the function of the part? By following this convention, if I have an IC and a transistor in identical SOFL packages, they would map to different footprints. Is this ever a desirable situation? Why not just group all SOFL packages under the name "SOFL"? I have the same question about "TRXDFN" vs "SON" |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Tom H
Admin Group 
Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 5719 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 Sep 2020 at 8:37am |
|
The Footprint and the 3D STEP model are the same naming convention.
The 3D model could have different color body, terminals, polarity marker. |
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options