Anyone Have Experience With SOT89 |
Post Reply |
Author | |
rickdehart
Advanced User Joined: 18 Apr 2012 Location: Austin, TX Status: Offline Points: 184 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 12 Jul 2013 at 3:51pm |
I am curious why all recommended footprints for SOT89 seem to allow the pins to overhang on the inside. I fear this could cause shorts.
|
|
Tom H
Admin Group Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 5719 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The SOT89 was one of the first SMT components invented.
There is no real industry standard so every mfr. makes their own version. For the Footprint creation I normally add 0.05 mm (2 mils) periphery around the component lead. I don't understand the datasheet link you provided where the component lead is Q = 0.062" but the mfr. recommended pattern has the pad length 0.059" which is smaller than the lead. So I don't trust the datasheet. The VPL only matches a specific mfr. part number with a footprint and there are dozens of different part numbers. You are correct that the footprint in your picture with the VPL lead will short to the copper pour. We have avoided creating a SOT89 component family for the Library Expert because pin 2 is irregular shaped and comes with many variations. This is one of those parts that you create once and never create it again (hopefully). |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |