PCB Libraries Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > PCB Footprint Expert > Questions & Answers
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Naming Convention
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Naming Convention

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
Tom H View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 05 Jan 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 5718
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tom H Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Feb 2023 at 2:15pm
IPC-7352 adds through-hole guidelines, updates surface mount guidelines and completely replaces IPC-7351. 

IPC-7352 was approved by committee ballot vote after 2nd go around and submitted to typesetting on September 27, 2022. 

It normally takes 3 - 4 months of typesetting and proofing. 

On January 18, 2023 a land pattern committee member asked to add Imperial Units to all dimensions. This might be the hold up, but I don't know why IPC would backtrack on it's commitment to only produce standards in metric units. 

Stay connected - follow us! X - LinkedIn
Back to Top
Back to Top
bolaandrews View Drop Down
New User
New User


Joined: 08 Mar 2023
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bolaandrews Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Mar 2023 at 8:40am
Hey Tom,

Is there any update on IPC-7352
Back to Top
Tom H View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 05 Jan 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 5718
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Tom H Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Mar 2023 at 10:07am
I don't have a clue. It's been silent at IPC. It's not even mentioned that there's a Land Pattern Committee meeting at IPC SummerCon in Milwaukee in May. 

I just post several questions on IPC Works asking for the status and whether or not the holdup is due to adding Imperial Units to the publication. 

Stay connected - follow us! X - LinkedIn
Back to Top
zentekfr View Drop Down
Advanced User
Advanced User


Joined: 04 Jan 2022
Status: Offline
Points: 83
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote zentekfr Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2023 at 6:38am
Hello Tom,

Regarding the naming convention, we currently use the "PCB Libraries" option. Would you recommend to switch to IPC-7352?
Changes between the two are still unclear to me.

Thanks!
Back to Top
Tom H View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 05 Jan 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 5718
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Tom H Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2023 at 8:57am
The biggest difference between PCB Libraries and IPC-7352 Footprint Naming Conventions is the Pin Quantity location. 

PCB Libraries follows the original IPC-7351C naming convention where the chair person of the IPC Land Pattern committee Karen McConnell relocated the Pin Qty. to the beginning of the footprint name. The full subcommittee of the 7351 voted and approved the new naming convention that Karen introduced. 

The component family, pin qty. and pin pitch are together, followed by the package dimensions.  

Example: SOP24P65_780X640X120L60X24

The IPC-7352 guide went back to the original IPC-7351B where the pin qty. was at the end of the Footprint Name. 

The component family, pin pitch are together, followed by the package dimensions and the pin qty last.

Example: SOP65P640X120-24

One of the problems with the 7352 for SOP packages, they didn't add the Package Length in the name and many people have been burned by this. Also, the Terminal Length is not included. 

Stay connected - follow us! X - LinkedIn
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.172 seconds.