![]() |
![]() |
Concave Modules |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Author | |
Randy Clemmons ![]() Advanced User ![]() Joined: 02 May 2012 Location: San Diego Status: Offline Points: 104 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 17 Jun 2014 at 11:31am |
Please add more pins for 'Side Concave Package'
Note this module has 18 pins. The current version does not support more than 16 pins for any of the concave packages. Also consider adding 'modules' to the 'Side Concave Package' family. Thank you
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Tom H ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 5750 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We decided to add a new component family for the .05 release called "Castellated Leads, 2 Sided" and allow the user to enter as many pins as needed. The Side Concave Chip Array was intended for Resistor Networks (not GPS Modules). |
|
![]() |
|
Randy Clemmons ![]() Advanced User ![]() Joined: 02 May 2012 Location: San Diego Status: Offline Points: 104 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
cool ! Thank you
|
|
![]() |
|
Tom H ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 5750 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We need help in defining the various "Component Families" that fall into this group "Castellated Leads, 2 Sided". So far we have "GPS" and we're not sure if that's a component family. Any others that we can add to the drop-down menu bar? Trying to keep things Standardized but it's getting difficult with today's technology. |
|
![]() |
|
jameshead ![]() Expert User ![]() ![]() Joined: 20 Mar 2012 Location: Oxfordshire, UK Status: Offline Points: 576 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We use a few of these types of modules as well for different functions: GPS, wireless, fieldbus.
I suspect the list would be endless as the companies providing these type of modules can dream up new functions and it's something I've looked at doing something similar here. I'd be happy with a calculator for a "standard" family but leave the naming to be a little more generic with Manufacturer_Manufacturer's-Part-Number. |
|
![]() |
|
Tom H ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 5750 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The IPC Castellated Lead package is LCC. But LCC has 4 sides.
So we're going to add a new component family called LCC 2-sided. In V2014.05 there will be -
Then we don't need to define every component family that falls into this category and the "Physical Description" will differentiate between 2 & 4 sided versions. I hope this is satisfactory to the users because we're doing this without approval from IPC. However, I will discuss this new 2-Sided LCC issue next month when the IPC-7351 Land Pattern committee leaders meet at IPC headquarters in Bannockburn, IL to review the status of adding through-hole technology to the standard as well as Drafting Outline and Polarity Marking guidelines for the "C" revision. |
|
![]() |
|
Randy Clemmons ![]() Advanced User ![]() Joined: 02 May 2012 Location: San Diego Status: Offline Points: 104 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hello Tom,
Your proposed LCC scheme will work fine for my needs. Thank you |
|
![]() |
|
jameshead ![]() Expert User ![]() ![]() Joined: 20 Mar 2012 Location: Oxfordshire, UK Status: Offline Points: 576 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sounds good. I think most module manufacturers provide a recommended footprint layout anyway. Certainly all the ones that we use have done this and it was only Randy's thread that piqued my interest here.
We usually end up doing a small daughter board to host the module on with our own connector on to make switching between different manufacturers' modules easier without changing the main boards of our products. |
|
![]() |
|
Tom H ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 5750 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There is no mfr. recommended footprint for this 2-Sided LCC Module - http://www.telit.com/telit/Pulsar/en_US.Store.display.1103./jupiter-sl871 |
|
![]() |
|
Randy Clemmons ![]() Advanced User ![]() Joined: 02 May 2012 Location: San Diego Status: Offline Points: 104 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi Tom, Correct, there is no recommended land pattern, only a mechanical dwg on sheet 29 at this link: No recommended land pattern is why I was keen on using the Library Expert to create the part from the component's mech dwg. I can dig up some suggested land patterns for other modules if your trying to determine a good solution for castellated modules in general. Randy |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |