Paste Mask Thermal Tab DPAK |
Post Reply |
Author | |
phil.holden
Advanced User Joined: 14 Aug 2020 Status: Offline Points: 59 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 13 Apr 2023 at 2:38am |
Hi Tom,
I have used the latest Enterprise Edition 23.06 to create a D2PAK footprint. I have noticed that the 50% Paste Mask checkboard is no longer being applied. Is there a reason for the change?
I noticed in the release notes of an earlier version it mentioned something about the tab being identified as 'mechanical' rather than 'thermal'. Would this mean that the thermal pad pattern would no longer be applied to DPAK thermal tabs? |
|
Tom H
Admin Group Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 5718 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
We originally made a mistake and identified the large DPAK pad as a thermal pad with a checker board paste mask. It's actually a Flat Lug Lead.
We're now following IPC J-STD-001 standard and it requires visible solder wetting on the end of the large tab. A Flat Lug Lead has a Toe solder joint and the pad is larger than the flat lug so the solder needs to run out to the end of the flat lug onto the extended pad to form a solder fillet. Wetting is evident (visible). A Thermal Pad is 100% under the package body and has no Toe, Heel or Side solder joint goals. There is no where for the solder to flow. i.e.: There is no evidence of visible wetting on a thermal tab. |
|
Tom H
Admin Group Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 5718 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
We are working on a new feature for the DPAK to allow a negative value for the L1 dimension.
This removes to Toe Solder Joint and turns the Flat Lug Lead into a Thermal Pad. If the large tab on the DPAK is 100% under the package it will have a checker board pattern. |
|
phil.holden
Advanced User Joined: 14 Aug 2020 Status: Offline Points: 59 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Makes total sense now you explain the initial mistake. Thanks for the explanation.
|
|
phil.holden
Advanced User Joined: 14 Aug 2020 Status: Offline Points: 59 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I also found the calculator for the DPAK a bit more logical.... It was perhaps that the datasheet dimensioning was a lot more in-line with the calculator as i'm not sure if you have made any changes to that part?
Previously when creating DPAK footprints i have always had to make numerous calculations in order to add the numbers in the format that the calculator wants, if that makes sense? |
|
Tom H
Admin Group Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 5718 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
There is a new V23.07 Footprint Expert Enterprise pre-release today that adds more features to the DPAK component family.
Fixed for DPAKs Negative tab terminal value L1 (shown as tab protrusion
beyond the body) is now allowed. (meaning L1 becomes the pull back distance of the
thermal tab and the tab can be entirely under the body). If the L1 dimension is less than zero (tab is entirely
under the body) and set back from the D dimension)
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |