![]() |
![]() |
Footprint Is Not Correct... |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
lalexman ![]() Expert User ![]() Joined: 30 Jul 2012 Status: Offline Points: 678 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 16 Apr 2013 at 4:56pm |
When I load the library SM_2012 and load footprint CAPC1608X86 it looks like
![]() If you hit OK it remains the same. If I change the height to 87 from 86 then it looks like ![]() Is there are reason the pad sizes change when it is forced to recalculate the footprint ?
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Tom H ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 5765 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We manually entered the component manufacturer recommended footprint dimensions in over 50% of the SM_2012 parts. You can instantly recognize a mfr. recommended pattern by the Yellow Dot warning when you open the FPX part into the Viewer.
As soon as you enter a new component package dimension, the program automatically uses your Preferences and not the component mfr. pattern. Read the attached IMPORTANT! document below. ![]() Here is a document that explains the FPX file features - IMPORTANT!_FPX_Guidelines.zip |
|
![]() |
|
lalexman ![]() Expert User ![]() Joined: 30 Jul 2012 Status: Offline Points: 678 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks Tom.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |