![]() |
|
Component zero Orientation A or B? |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | |
Tom H
Admin Group
Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 6029 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Component zero Orientation A or B?Posted: 30 Mar 2020 at 11:46am |
|
We're building a lot of 4-pin DFN footprints for PCBPOD, and Pin 1 is all over the place.
Pin 1 in lower left, upper left, upper right, lower right. There is no standard pin out for the 4-pin DFN package and therefore there is no standard Pin 1 Zero Orientation. Never will be. The component manufacturer's are doing whatever they want. |
|
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Tom H
Admin Group
Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 6029 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Feb 2020 at 2:18pm |
|
Right now we're getting ready to release our V2020 Library Expert Beta in 2 weeks.
The programmers are not going to update anything until after the official release in mid-April. The main reason is that V2020 is a total rewrite that started a year ago and nothing is going to distract them from meeting release deadlines. This is not an easy fix and may take a week, but the most important thing is 100,000 users with existing libraries created by Library Expert do not like changes. Even though you can control the Zero Orientation in Preferences. |
|
![]() |
|
ransonjd
Advanced User
Joined: 15 Nov 2016 Status: Offline Points: 142 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Feb 2020 at 1:48pm |
|
Hi Tom, Thanks for the info. Since there's no DFN specific reason to favor the current orientation, could the orientation be updated to match the orientation of similar 3&4-pin components? I feel like one of the major benefits of PCB libraries is the consistency of the footprints generated, and DFNs seem like an odd exception.
|
|
![]() |
|
Tom H
Admin Group
Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 6029 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Feb 2020 at 1:17pm |
|
I forgot to mention the main reason.
Unlike most component families, the 4-pin DFN has multiple pin configurations and Pin 1 can be in different locations. So there really is no Zero Orientation for the 4-pin DFN. |
|
![]() |
|
Tom H
Admin Group
Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 6029 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Feb 2020 at 1:15pm |
|
It's because the "D" dimension is normally larger than the "E" dimension.
Our software programmer didn't read our documentation. ![]() Not sure if IPC-7351C will ever adopt the Orientation B concept to align with the IEC 61188-7 Standard which lists both A & B orientations. I'm not sure if IPC-7351C will ever be released. The chairman Karen McConnell just stepped down after 20 years and the subcommittee is losing interest. |
|
![]() |
|
ransonjd
Advanced User
Joined: 15 Nov 2016 Status: Offline Points: 142 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Feb 2020 at 1:00pm |
|
Hi, I'm noting that 4-pin DFNs still follow "A" orientation and not "B" orientation. What's the motivation for this difference from other 4-pin components? Thanks!
|
|
![]() |
|
AB_Regin
Active User
Joined: 14 Mar 2018 Status: Offline Points: 24 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Oct 2018 at 10:37pm |
|
Thanx Tom!
I can help you by telling that I discovered this issue after POD download of this one:
|
|
![]() |
|
Tom H
Admin Group
Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 6029 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Oct 2018 at 8:23am |
|
I see now what you are referring to.
I created the documentation, so now I have to find some 4-pin DFN parts and see what the typical pin numbering scheme is for Antenna, Capacitor, Crystal, Diode, Filter, Inductor, IC, Oscillator (the most used family for this package), Resistor & Transistor. Thank you for reporting this issue. |
|
![]() |
|
AB_Regin
Active User
Joined: 14 Mar 2018 Status: Offline Points: 24 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Oct 2018 at 1:17am |
|
And more...
I found this document, in which the DFN-4 is described as an oscillator (this is just a matter of a different 3D Body i guess): https://www.pcblibraries.com/Products/FPX/UserGuide/download/Library%20Expert%20Surface%20Mount%20Families.pdf Here in this document it shows the correct rotation for level B, but your library expert outputs it as level A! |
|
![]() |
|
AB_Regin
Active User
Joined: 14 Mar 2018 Status: Offline Points: 24 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Oct 2018 at 12:58am |
|
I can add some more information after some searching..
I found this old topic: At that time you Tom said that the Library Expert follows the IPC 7315C and Level B zero rotation, but that does not seem to be the case with the DFN-4? |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |