PCB Libraries Forum : Naming Convention for PTH Headers https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/ Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:10:47 +0000 Fri, 15 May 2015 13:32:05 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.07 360 https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=1665 <![CDATA[PCB Libraries Forum]]> https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/forum_images/PCBLForumLogo.gif https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/ <![CDATA[Naming Convention for PTH Headers : IPC-7351C is deep in development....]]> https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/naming-convention-for-pth-headers_topic1665_post6826.html#6826 Author: Tom H
Subject: 1665
Posted: 15 May 2015 at 1:32pm

IPC-7351C is deep in development. Our next meeting is Monday morning.
 
It will go out to the entire 1-13 Land Pattern sub-committee next week for review and feedback.
 
It will go through final Executive Committee approval in September at SMTA in Rosemont, IL and then head out for 30-day ballot vote with the 1-13 Land Pattern sub-committee.
 
Then the new Guideline will go into type setting for first article proof and then in February 2016 production should begin.
 
The IPC-7351C Guideline is 90% written but the last 10% will take a couple months and the evaluation and editing / approval phase also takes a couple months. Voting could take 90 days if it doesn't pass on the 1st vote.
 
]]> Fri, 15 May 2015 13:32:05 +0000 https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/naming-convention-for-pth-headers_topic1665_post6826.html#6826 <![CDATA[Naming Convention for PTH Headers : Has C been released\published...]]> https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/naming-convention-for-pth-headers_topic1665_post6824.html#6824 Author: Mattylad
Subject: 1665
Posted: 15 May 2015 at 1:15pm

Has C been released\published yet?
]]> Fri, 15 May 2015 13:15:02 +0000 https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/naming-convention-for-pth-headers_topic1665_post6824.html#6824 <![CDATA[Naming Convention for PTH Headers : Please start using the new IPC-7351C...]]> https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/naming-convention-for-pth-headers_topic1665_post6784.html#6784 Author: Tom H
Subject: 1665
Posted: 30 Apr 2015 at 5:13am

Please start using the new IPC-7351C Footprint Naming Convention for all connectors.
 
MfrName_MfrPartNumber
 
]]> Thu, 30 Apr 2015 05:13:56 +0000 https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/naming-convention-for-pth-headers_topic1665_post6784.html#6784 <![CDATA[Naming Convention for PTH Headers : I foundduplicate names in PTH...]]> https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/naming-convention-for-pth-headers_topic1665_post6783.html#6783 Author: vgalindo
Subject: 1665
Posted: 30 Apr 2015 at 12:35am

I found duplicate names in PTH connectors using the Footprint Naming Convention.

The W identifier does not distinguish between circular or square Lead Shape, this create the same footprint name for different connectors; eg,
HDRV2W65P254_2X1_508X254H945 could have:
- a 0.65mm square lead shape and hole of 1.12mm, or
- a 0.65mm circular lead shape and hole of 0.85mm

It would be interesting to specify the Lead Shape in W identifier?

Thank you very much.

]]> Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:35:54 +0000 https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/naming-convention-for-pth-headers_topic1665_post6783.html#6783