PCB Libraries Forum : New BGA FPX file? https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/ Sun, 12 Apr 2026 12:08:14 +0000 Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:45:35 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.07 360 https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=1051 <![CDATA[PCB Libraries Forum]]> https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/forum_images/PCBLForumLogo.gif https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/ <![CDATA[New BGA FPX file? : Hi Nick,No rush on the file....]]> https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/new-bga-fpx-file_topic1051_post4074.html#4074 Author: DaveCowl
Subject: 1051
Posted: 29 Jul 2013 at 3:45pm

Hi Nick,

No rush on the file. Glad that LITE has its own separate installer ... I have no need for that! :D
]]> Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:45:35 +0000 https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/new-bga-fpx-file_topic1051_post4074.html#4074 <![CDATA[New BGA FPX file? : Folder structure was modified...]]> https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/new-bga-fpx-file_topic1051_post4073.html#4073 Author: Nick B
Subject: 1051
Posted: 29 Jul 2013 at 3:30pm

Folder structure was modified to allow for two separate installers (regular and Lite versions). Nothing changed in the library structure.
 
The BGA library file is only available to customers. I can email it to you if you want, otherwise it will be posted very soon on the upcoming customer page.
]]> Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:30:32 +0000 https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/new-bga-fpx-file_topic1051_post4073.html#4073 <![CDATA[New BGA FPX file? : When I uninstalled all older versions...]]> https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/new-bga-fpx-file_topic1051_post4072.html#4072 Author: DaveCowl
Subject: 1051
Posted: 29 Jul 2013 at 3:21pm


When I uninstalled all older versions of FPE and installed 13_09, it did not install a new BGA FPX as noted in the release notes. 

It also didn't seem to have anything new in terms of library structure... just the usual Libraries folder with the two Samples in it.

Am I missing something?
]]> Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:21:36 +0000 https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/new-bga-fpx-file_topic1051_post4072.html#4072