PCB Libraries Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Libraries > Footprints / Land Patterns
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Molded Body part cell
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Molded Body part cell

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Nightwish View Drop Down
Active User
Active User
Avatar

Joined: 20 Feb 2012
Location: Shanghai China
Status: Offline
Points: 33
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nightwish Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Molded Body part cell
    Posted: 03 Jul 2012 at 6:45pm
I am using LP Wizard to create a Molded Body inductor and the setting for Side of pad is -0.1mm. The factory guys suggest that pad should be wider than the lead. I am not sure why LP Wizard uses this kind of settings. Please see picture below. I use level C when created the cell.
 
 
Thanks,
 
Nightwish
Back to Top
Back to Top
Tom H View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 05 Jan 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 5719
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tom H Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jul 2012 at 6:53pm
This is the IPC-7351 standard. There is extra "pad width" generated by the Fabrication and Assembly Tolerances in the math. Sop when you use negative values for Side Goal you're only compensating for the other tolerances.
 
However, the LP Wizard User has full editing control of all the User Settings. Change the Molded Body Side Goal to 0.05 or any value the OEM wants.
 
Back to Top
Nightwish View Drop Down
Active User
Active User
Avatar

Joined: 20 Feb 2012
Location: Shanghai China
Status: Offline
Points: 33
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nightwish Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jul 2012 at 7:01pm
Hi Tom,
 
Thanks for your fast replySmile
 
I read the IPC7351 but can not find any words talking about this. Can you show me in which Chapter IPC7351 has a definition on this?
Also what is the benefit of this negative setting compared to a larger value? Or if there is other potential risk if we use a negative value during PCBA?
 
Thanks,
 
Nightwish
Back to Top
Tom H View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 05 Jan 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 5719
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tom H Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jul 2012 at 7:07pm
IPC-7351B Page 19 Table 3-13 "Inward Flat Ribbon L-Leads" (top of page)
(Molded Inductors, Diodes & Polarized Capacitors) 
  
Notice the Toe, Heel and Side Goals for "Nominal" environment and Side = -0.05
 
Back to Top
Nightwish View Drop Down
Active User
Active User
Avatar

Joined: 20 Feb 2012
Location: Shanghai China
Status: Offline
Points: 33
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nightwish Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jul 2012 at 7:14pm
Great!
 
I have IPC-7351A on hand and I found that table.
 
I will try to explain this to the factory guys and hope there is no big issue during PCA.
 
Back to Top
Tom H View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 05 Jan 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 5719
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tom H Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 Jul 2012 at 10:08am
IPC says there does not need to be a "Side Goal" for Molded Body packages because it doesn't do anything to improve the assembly attachment. i.e.: a side goal on Molded Body Inward L-Bend lead does nothing for the overall solder joint strength.
 
However, the Toe and Heel Goals are very robust for this component family and this is where the solder joint strength is. Also, not having a side goal aligns the package straight on the pads. If you add a side goal, the Molded Body part can drift during reflow and come out of the oven at an angle.
 
Think about it, the Inward L-Bend component lead is just a piece of formed sheet metal and what good would a side goal perform on a thin piece of sheet metal?
 
 
 
Back to Top
Nightwish View Drop Down
Active User
Active User
Avatar

Joined: 20 Feb 2012
Location: Shanghai China
Status: Offline
Points: 33
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nightwish Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Jul 2012 at 5:08am
I confirmed this with our DFME and we made agreement that the cell is ok. Good news is the factory accept our librarySmile
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.266 seconds.