PCB Libraries Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > PCB Footprint Expert > Product Suggestions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Custom Output For Allegro
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Custom Output For Allegro
 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
mahmoodv99 View Drop Down
Advanced User
Advanced User


Joined: 16 Jan 2016
Status: Offline
Points: 93 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mahmoodv99 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Custom Output For Allegro
    Posted: 10 May 2016 at 10:29pm
Add option to include/exclude unwanted layers  from output file such as -
  1. DFA BOUND TOP
  2. DEV TYPE
  3. ASSEMBLY BOTTOM
  4. etc.
Back to Top
Back to Top
chrisa_pcb View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 29 Jul 2012
Location: San Diego
Status: Offline
Points: 772 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote chrisa_pcb Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 May 2016 at 9:35am
Hmm.. i'll consider it. How critical is this feature and what is the typical usage of when it is needed?
Back to Top
mahmoodv99 View Drop Down
Advanced User
Advanced User


Joined: 16 Jan 2016
Status: Offline
Points: 93 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mahmoodv99 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 May 2016 at 8:43pm
We are not using DEV TYPE and DFA BOUND TOP. So if you add option to exclude this, we can reduce our QA procedure for footprint verification.
Back to Top
GrungyRemnant View Drop Down
Advanced User
Advanced User


Joined: 17 Oct 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 91 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote GrungyRemnant Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 May 2016 at 7:12am
You should consider using SKILL to do any customization that you would like.

We don't run the scripts generated by the wizard directly.  They are all run though a SKILL routine where we customize the features to suit our needs.  For example making the Place_Bound_Top match the physical size of the component, create a DFA_BOUND_TOP shape to be more useful when using the DFA Constraints, or automatically assigning the DFA_DEV_CLASS to company approved values base on the footprint name/size.  The options are endless.

I think its the best way to handle this for any company's unique requirements.

Regards,
Chris
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.313 seconds.