<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>PCB Libraries Forum : SODF OR DFN</title>
  <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; PCB Libraries Forum : Altium : SODF OR DFN]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 15:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 23:49:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>30</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=3634</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[SODF OR DFN : Dear Tom and Team,Yes, I thought...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/sodf-or-dfn_topic3634_post14510.html#14510</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=15739">dramos</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3634<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 15 Apr 2026 at 11:49pm<br /><br />Dear Tom and Team,<div><br></div><div>Yes, I thought the same about SODF and DFN.</div><div>So I consider that the footprint I created is correct.</div><div><br></div><div>In the other hand, it is my question about the shape of the internal corners of the pad.</div><div>On our company, when we create a footprint we build it with Nominal density option and Most density option. The program allows to do it in a very fast and easy way.</div><div><br></div><div>In both cases, the value Side and Heel is 0.00. It could be similar to the value 0.00 that we have in the Periphery parameter on a DFN.</div><div><br></div><div>Furthermore, there are some SODF components where the lead is below the body, for example the mentioned&nbsp;RB751S40T1G.</div><div><br></div><div>Yesterday, when I saw the component that I downloaded I started thinking that perhaps it had sense and It could be done using the new features that Altium developed.</div><div><br></div><div>I know that it could be a crazy idea, but I would like to start this discussion with you because in PCBFE you have a big and long knowledge. You've been involved in footprints for decades. In my company there is not a dedicated librarian to share with him this kind of ideas.</div><div><br></div><div>Anyway, thanks for your comments.</div><div>david</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 23:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/sodf-or-dfn_topic3634_post14510.html#14510</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[SODF OR DFN : This package is definitely a SODFL...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/sodf-or-dfn_topic3634_post14508.html#14508</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3634<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 15 Apr 2026 at 10:47am<br /><br />This package is definitely a SODFL package.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>A DFN is a BTC package where the terminal lead are completely under the package body.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>DFNs do not have terminal leads that protrude outside the package body.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div><b>SODFL</b>:</div><div><br></div><div><img src="uploads/3/SODFL2.png" height="100" width="170" border="0" /><br></div><div></div><div><br></div><div><b>DFN</b>:</div><div><br></div><div><img src="uploads/3/DFN2.png" height="186" width="260" border="0" /><br></div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 10:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/sodf-or-dfn_topic3634_post14508.html#14508</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[SODF OR DFN : Hi Tom and Team,I was working...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/sodf-or-dfn_topic3634_post14507.html#14507</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=15739">dramos</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3634<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 15 Apr 2026 at 10:23am<br /><br />Hi Tom and Team,<div><br><div>I was working in this SOD-523 diode, <b>onsemi </b>part number&nbsp;<a href="https://www.&#111;nsemi.cn/pdf/datasheet/rb751s40t1-d.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">RB751S40T1G</a>&nbsp;.</div><div><br></div><div>Suddenly, I had a doubt with a value because the length of the pin is 0.30mm REF, I was thinking to use +/-0.05mm of tolerance but I said to my self: "how PCBFE resolve this question? and I've gone to the Parts area and bingo! it is ready to download.</div><div><br></div><div>After downloading I opened it and It was not similar to a SOD-523, it seems more a DFN component.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div><img src="uploads/15739/Screenshot_3.png" height="250" width="500" border="0" /><br></div><div><br></div><div>Could we consider this kind of components a DFN and why?&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>My first impression has been: the footprint is no correct but then... and why not?&nbsp;</div><div>I attached the downloaded file as well.</div><div><a href="uploads/15739/&#111;nsemi_RB751S40T1G.fpx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">uploads/15739/onsemi_RB751S40T1G.fpx</a></div><div><br></div><div>My component was more "traditional"</div><div><br></div><div><img src="uploads/15739/Screenshot_4.png" height="330" width="750" border="0" /><br></div><div><br></div><div>I attached as well my component fpx&nbsp;</div><div><a href="uploads/15739/david_RB751S40T1G.fpx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">uploads/15739/david_RB751S40T1G.fpx</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Anyway I am not very happy with my footprint and as now we have a new feature where we can modify the corners of a footprint when the pad is rounded rectangle or chamfered pad.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div><img src="uploads/15739/Screenshot_5.png" height="330" width="750" border="0" /><br></div><div><br></div><div>Using this feature I created the inner corners of the component squared&nbsp; and outer corners rounded. the inner corners are under the component and perhaps are more close to s DFN...</div><div><br></div><div>What's your opinion?</div><div><br></div><div><img src="uploads/15739/Screenshot_6.png" height="388" width="858" border="0" /><br></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks for your comments, they are always really appreciated.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>David</div></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 10:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/sodf-or-dfn_topic3634_post14507.html#14507</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>