<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>PCB Libraries Forum : Question About Pad Place Round-off</title>
  <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; PCB Libraries Forum : Questions &amp; Answers : Question About Pad Place Round-off]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 07:36:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=2174</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Question About Pad Place Round-off : Pad place round-off is only in...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/question-about-pad-place-roundoff_topic2174_post9011.html#9011</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2174<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 23 Jun 2017 at 7:36am<br /><br />Pad place round-off is only in 1 direction, the Lead Span pads. <br /><br />The pitch is always the pitch and there is absolutely no rounding on the pin pitch. The pitch has to be 100% accurate. <br />]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 07:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/question-about-pad-place-roundoff_topic2174_post9011.html#9011</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Question About Pad Place Round-off : Additional question, what how...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/question-about-pad-place-roundoff_topic2174_post9010.html#9010</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=12314">nicolasr</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2174<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 23 Jun 2017 at 1:48am<br /><br />Additional question, what how would you do to round off to 0.01 when it is given as pitch (for instance, SOT23 or SOD...)<br>A pitch of 0.65 gives pads placement at 0.325... despite pad placement round off at 0.02!<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 01:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/question-about-pad-place-roundoff_topic2174_post9010.html#9010</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Question About Pad Place Round-off : Oh, didn&amp;#039;t see it this way......]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/question-about-pad-place-roundoff_topic2174_post9001.html#9001</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=12314">nicolasr</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2174<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 22 Jun 2017 at 6:37am<br /><br />Oh, didn't see it this way... shame on me! Sometimes the simpler the better.<br>Thanks!]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 06:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/question-about-pad-place-roundoff_topic2174_post9001.html#9001</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Question About Pad Place Round-off : I believe the pad place round-off...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/question-about-pad-place-roundoff_topic2174_post8997.html#8997</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2174<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 21 Jun 2017 at 8:32am<br /><br />I believe the pad place round-off is the spacing between the pads. <br /><br />For example on an 0603 capacitor the space between pin 1 & 2 are rounded to 0.01 increments. Not the distance from the origin to the pin. <br /><br />Try using a 0.02 pad place round-off and you'll get 0.01 rounding from the origin to the pin.<br /><br /><br />]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 08:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/question-about-pad-place-roundoff_topic2174_post8997.html#8997</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Question About Pad Place Round-off : Dear all,There is something I...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/question-about-pad-place-roundoff_topic2174_post8996.html#8996</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=12314">nicolasr</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2174<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 21 Jun 2017 at 1:56am<br /><br />Dear all,<div>There is something I definitely do not understand with PCB Library E. Lite.  I use the 2017.14 release.</div><div><br /></div><div>When generating a Chip capacitor 0603 for instance, In Terminal/Settings I have 0.01 set for both Pad Place Round-Off and Pad Size Round-Off.</div><div>Generated pads are 0.93x0.82mm which are fine.</div><div>But X position is ±0.755 meaning a 0.005 increment instead of being rounded to 0.76 or 0.75?!</div><div><br /></div><div>Is it a bug or some other setting having higher priority??</div><div>Thanks,</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 01:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/question-about-pad-place-roundoff_topic2174_post8996.html#8996</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>