<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>PCB Libraries Forum : Anyone Have Experience With SOT89</title>
  <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; PCB Libraries Forum : General Discussion : Anyone Have Experience With SOT89]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 17:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 18:01:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=1015</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Anyone Have Experience With SOT89 :  The SOT89 was one of the first...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/anyone-have-experience-with-sot89_topic1015_post3888.html#3888</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1015<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 12 Jul 2013 at 6:01pm<br /><br />The SOT89 was one of the first SMT components invented. <div>&nbsp;</div><div>There is no real industry standard so every mfr. makes their own version. </div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>For the Footprint creation I normally add 0.05 mm (2 mils)&nbsp;periphery around the component lead. </div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>I don't understand the datasheet link you provided where the component lead is Q = 0.062" but the mfr. recommended pattern has the pad length 0.059" which is smaller than the lead. So I don't trust the datasheet. </div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>The VPL only matches a specific mfr. part number with a footprint and there are dozens of different part numbers. </div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>You are correct that the footprint in your picture with the VPL lead will short to the copper pour. </div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>We have avoided creating a SOT89 component family for the Library Expert because pin 2 is irregular shaped and comes with many variations. This is one of those parts that you create once and never create it again (hopefully). </div><div>&nbsp;</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 18:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/anyone-have-experience-with-sot89_topic1015_post3888.html#3888</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Anyone Have Experience With SOT89 :  I am curious why all recommended...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/anyone-have-experience-with-sot89_topic1015_post3887.html#3887</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=107">rickdehart</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1015<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 12 Jul 2013 at 3:51pm<br /><br />I am curious why all recommended footprints for SOT89 seem to allow the pins to overhang on the inside.&nbsp; I fear this could cause shorts.&nbsp; <div>&nbsp;</div>Here is a Valor VPL review of the standard SOT89 footprint.&nbsp;Has anyone else experienced this?&nbsp; <div>&nbsp;</div>I've also attached a datasheet -&nbsp;<a href="uploads/107/Case_style_Dimensi&#111;n_DF782.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">uploads/107/Case_style_Dimension_DF782.pdf</a><div>&nbsp;</div><div><img src="uploads/107/SOT_89.PNG" height="486" width="589" border="0" /></div><div>&nbsp;</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/anyone-have-experience-with-sot89_topic1015_post3887.html#3887</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>