PCB Libraries Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > General > General Discussion
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - IPC-7351C ?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

IPC-7351C ?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Matthew Lamkin View Drop Down
Advanced User
Advanced User


Joined: 02 Oct 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 284
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Matthew Lamkin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: IPC-7351C ?
    Posted: 04 Dec 2012 at 9:19am
Hi,

What version of IPC-7351 does the "PCB Library Expert" currently follow?

Also do you know when rev C is being released?

I cannot find much about it on the IPC standard status page, only a Power Point.

Thank you.
Back to Top
Back to Top
Tom H View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 05 Jan 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 5716
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tom H Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 Dec 2012 at 10:46am
The changes to the IPC-7351C are in a Power Point presentation located here and it's called "PCB Design Optimization Starts in the CAD Library" - http://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/pcb-library-optimization-presentation-free_topic468.html 
 
The IPC-7351 committee just completed a 2 month review of all the changes and they accepted all of them. Right now, the ball is in IPC's court to implement the changes.
 
I believe that IPC is going to delegate the changes to various team members for incorporation. After the content is completed, the 1st draft goes out for committee vote for 30-days. At the end of 30-days, the committee submits all the typos and revisions that they want added or fixed and then the final draft of the standard goes back out for 30-day committee and hopefully for final approval.
 
Then the document goes to type setting which normally takes a month and then out to the print shop where the initial order is placed for the prototype copies. The committee members get the prototype copies and after they approve, mass production starts and the publication goes on sale.
 
So my best guess is that IPC-7351C will be available to purchase in Q1 2014.
 
Stay connected - follow us! X - LinkedIn
Back to Top
Tom H View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 05 Jan 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 5716
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tom H Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 Dec 2012 at 11:17am
I forgot to mention that the only signifigant difference in the PCB Footprint Expert between IPC-7351B and IPC-7351C is the rotation.
 
IPC-7351B Zero Component Orientation is Pin 1 Upper Left.
 
IPC-7351C introduces two Zero Component Orientations.
  1. Pin 1 Upper Left = Level A
  2. Pin 1 Lower Left = Level B

The PCB Footprint Expert follows "Level B" because it's also the international IEC 61188-7 standard.

If you want to use the IPC-7351B Zero Component Orientation, there is a "Default Preference" file called IPC-7351B_DefaultPreferences.dat
 
Back to Top
Mattylad View Drop Down
Advanced User
Advanced User
Avatar

Joined: 02 Jun 2012
Location: Lancashire UK
Status: Offline
Points: 152
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mattylad Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 Dec 2012 at 12:10pm
Using V33 IPC-7351B_DefaultPreferences.dat still displays as pin 1 lower left.

Changing the user preferences to point the default preferences to the above file saving it and exiting the program. Restarting and checking the defaults are set to the above file - all OK so far.

Open SM.fpx and look at an SOIC.

Pin 1 is bottom left.

So it seems its not quite matching rev B ?


Back to Top
Tom H View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 05 Jan 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 5716
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tom H Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 Dec 2012 at 3:17pm
How about a new "Batch Create" window that pops up prior to the CAD interface window and contains dropdown menus for -
  • Units
  • Environment
  • Fab Level
  • User Preferences
  • Default Preferences

This way you can change anything you want prior to Batch Creation of your FPX file.

Would this work? Can anyone think of anything else to add?
 
Back to Top
Matthew Lamkin View Drop Down
Advanced User
Advanced User


Joined: 02 Oct 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 284
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Matthew Lamkin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Dec 2012 at 2:20am
How about we just set the above settings so that whatever method we use to export our components they are already set?

That IMO would work best.

Yes the ability to make the change for each output would be useful but not as the only way to do it.

If I have 30 components to check dimensions of then output and am going to do it one at a time I certainly would not want to have to change the settings each time. Also if I select a load of components to batch output it would be nice to be able to change to least when I'm in nominal at the point that I output them, but only because I have forgotten - but I would not want this to be the only way - I might want to output several different batches in the same format without having to set them up each time.

IMO There is no need to try and make this more complicated than it needs to be, to have several path to the settings with several different types of settings - a single setup dialogue (that configures all) that a user can get to from either the main menu or the batch create that controls how all output are set is more than adequate.
Back to Top
Tom H View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 05 Jan 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 5716
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tom H Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Dec 2012 at 11:23am
The "IPC-7351B_DefaultPreferences.dat" produces the correct Zero Component Orientation (Pin 1 Left or Upper Left). In order to see the correct results the User Preference Environment Setting must be Least, Nominal or Most. If the "Setup > User Preference" Environment Setting is set to "User" then the "UserPreferences.dat" takes over.
 
So if you are using UserPreferences.dat, to fix the problem, you need to update the UserPreferences.dat file to reflect the Zero Component Rotation of the "IPC-7351B_DefaultPreferences.dat" file.
 
There are 2 ways to easily fix this. The best way is to open "Setup > User Preferences > Component > select a Component Family > select the << button to move the Pin 1 location from Default to User"
 
This is how to update SOIC/SOP/CFP Zero Component Orientation -
 
 
 
The other way to fix the issue is to select the User dropdown menu in each component family and set the Pin 1 location to match the Default.
 
Also, I mentioned that we could possibly change the program to a single set of Preferences and after talking to customers and the FPE programmers, they want to keep the current process as it's far more flexible and offers more features than a single set of Preferences.
 
Personally, I would define all my settings using the Default Preferernce Editor and then set my environment to "Nominal". This way I can easily change environments from Least to Most to Nominal and get all the Drafting and Rule settings that I want. i.e.: Once you create a good Default Preference file and load it, there is no reason to ever apply Environment "User".
 
This is very simple but difficult to understand by some users.
 
Back to Top
Matthew Lamkin View Drop Down
Advanced User
Advanced User


Joined: 02 Oct 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 284
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Matthew Lamkin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Dec 2012 at 2:58am
Quote This is very simple but difficult to understand by some users.

You can say that again.

here, let me.
Quote
This is very simple but difficult to understand by some users.

Smile
Back to Top
jameshead View Drop Down
Expert User
Expert User
Avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2012
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 576
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jameshead Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Dec 2012 at 4:20am
I didn't get this bit at first either and it took a few e-mails between Tom and I before I "got" it.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.234 seconds.