![]() |
![]() |
Advice sought for holes close on Mini DisplayPort |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
DaveCowl ![]() Advanced User ![]() ![]() Joined: 18 Oct 2012 Location: Santa Clara, CA Status: Offline Points: 161 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 08 Nov 2012 at 4:33pm |
I have a sticky issue for a Mini DisplayPort connector with through hole pins. The holes are recommended at 0.6mm but there are holes only 1mm apart! So, in order to maintain a clearance of say 0.15mm between pads I get 0.85mm diameter pad (compared to recommended pad of 1.1mm for 0.6mm hole). So, the question is, which 'rules' are best to follow. I am inclined towards maintaining the pad to pad spacing and having a tight annular ring, rather than compromise pad to pad spacing for a larger ring and risk bridging. Any guidance on this appreciated. Cheers! |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
DaveCowl ![]() Advanced User ![]() ![]() Joined: 18 Oct 2012 Location: Santa Clara, CA Status: Offline Points: 161 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It looks like the pins are rectangular, max 0.25mm wide, so maybe I can also shrink the hole from 0.6mm to .55 or even 0.5mm...?
|
|
![]() |
|
Tom H ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 05 Jan 2012 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 5752 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A 0.25 mm square pin size could fit easily into a 0.55 mm hole, but still that's a 0.95 mm pad per Proportional Padstack.
Download the IPC-7351 Padstack Calculator - It has Least, Nominal & Most environment padstack calculations. Great resource tool for when you're in a jam. |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |