<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>PCB Libraries Forum : SMPC (TO-277A) made out of DFN standard</title>
  <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; PCB Libraries Forum : Footprints / Land Patterns : SMPC (TO-277A) made out of DFN standard]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 10:22:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=3067</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[SMPC (TO-277A) made out of DFN standard : So I probably missed the rounded...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/smpc-to277a-made-out-of-dfn-standard_topic3067_post12252.html#12252</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=16707">zentekfr</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3067<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 25 Feb 2022 at 10:22am<br /><br />So I probably missed the rounded rectangle option.<div>Then a webcast is welcome! I will send you an e-mail.</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 10:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/smpc-to277a-made-out-of-dfn-standard_topic3067_post12252.html#12252</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[SMPC (TO-277A) made out of DFN standard : In FP Designer you have 100% control...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/smpc-to277a-made-out-of-dfn-standard_topic3067_post12248.html#12248</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3067<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 24 Feb 2022 at 10:42am<br /><br />In FP Designer you have 100% control of the pad stacks like Rounded Rectangle Pads and Pad Shapes.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>All non-standard package footprints should be created in FP Designer.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>This is not a 3-Tier Density footprint. Only the mfr. recommended pattern will work correctly.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>If you need FP Designer training, we can do a quick webcast so I can show you some great features.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 10:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/smpc-to277a-made-out-of-dfn-standard_topic3067_post12248.html#12248</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[SMPC (TO-277A) made out of DFN standard : Hello Tom,Of course it&amp;#039;s...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/smpc-to277a-made-out-of-dfn-standard_topic3067_post12247.html#12247</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=16707">zentekfr</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3067<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 24 Feb 2022 at 12:58am<br /><br />Hello Tom,<div><br></div><div>Of course it's not a DFN. But as soon as I use the FP Designer, I'm losing much of the features of Footprint Expert (3-tier density system, rounded rectangle pads, pad shapes drawing, Master options for batch generation, ...).</div><div>That's why I considered building it from a known standard package.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks for your answer&nbsp;<img src="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif" border="0" alt="Wink" title="Wink" /></div><div>Justin</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/smpc-to277a-made-out-of-dfn-standard_topic3067_post12247.html#12247</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[SMPC (TO-277A) made out of DFN standard : The Vishay TO-277A Case Code is...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/smpc-to277a-made-out-of-dfn-standard_topic3067_post12246.html#12246</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3067<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 23 Feb 2022 at 9:45am<br /><br />The Vishay TO-277A Case Code is not a 3-pin DFN component family.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>This footprint must be created in FP Designer.&nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>There are 34 Vishay part numbers on <a href="https://www.pcblibraries.com/POD" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">www.pcblibraries.com/POD</a> that have the TO-277A Case Code.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Try this one -&nbsp;<a href="uploads/3/Vishay_TO-277A.zip" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">uploads/3/Vishay_TO-277A.zip</a></div><div><br></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 09:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/smpc-to277a-made-out-of-dfn-standard_topic3067_post12246.html#12246</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[SMPC (TO-277A) made out of DFN standard : I add the drawings and datasheet...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/smpc-to277a-made-out-of-dfn-standard_topic3067_post12245.html#12245</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=16707">zentekfr</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3067<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 23 Feb 2022 at 6:06am<br /><br /><div>I add the drawings and datasheet for reference:&nbsp;https://www.vishay.com/docs/89335/ar4pm.pdf</div><div><br></div><img src="uploads/16707/SMPC_drawings.png" height="676" width="631" border="0" />]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 06:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/smpc-to277a-made-out-of-dfn-standard_topic3067_post12245.html#12245</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[SMPC (TO-277A) made out of DFN standard : Hello,In the process of building...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/smpc-to277a-made-out-of-dfn-standard_topic3067_post12244.html#12244</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=16707">zentekfr</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 3067<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 23 Feb 2022 at 3:57am<br /><br />Hello,<div><br></div><div>In the process of building a footprint for a SMPC component (standardized against JEDEC TO-277A), I found that a 3-pin DFN could do the job. The obtained land pattern is very close to the manufacturer's recommended footprint. Of course the pins should be reordered/renamed.</div><div>Is my idea of building this part out of a DFN3 good? Not advisable? And why?</div><div><img src="uploads/16707/SMPC_from_DFN3.png" height="233" width="318" border="0" /><img src="uploads/16707/SMPC_from_DFN3_Altium.png" height="233" width="317" border="0" /><br></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks!</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 03:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/smpc-to277a-made-out-of-dfn-standard_topic3067_post12244.html#12244</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>