<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>PCB Libraries Forum : Missing Tolerances</title>
  <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; PCB Libraries Forum : Footprints / Land Patterns : Missing Tolerances]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 02:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:31:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.07</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=1561</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Missing Tolerances :  Good information, Tom!Thanks...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/missing-tolerances_topic1561_post6342.html#6342</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=5073">5not4</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1561<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 18 Feb 2015 at 10:31am<br /><br />Good information, Tom!<div>&nbsp;</div><div>Thanks for the quick response.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Roy.</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/missing-tolerances_topic1561_post6342.html#6342</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Missing Tolerances :  Tolerances are normally +/-...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/missing-tolerances_topic1561_post6340.html#6340</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3">Tom H</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1561<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 18 Feb 2015 at 9:52am<br /><br />Tolerances are normally +/- 0.20 mm for larger dimensions and between +/- 0.10 &amp; 0.15 mm for&nbsp;small dimensions. <div>&nbsp;</div>However,&nbsp;for the Corner Concave component family I tend to use the mfr. recommended pattern. <div></div>&nbsp;]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/missing-tolerances_topic1561_post6340.html#6340</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Missing Tolerances :  Is there a &amp;#039;typical&amp;#039;...]]></title>
   <link>https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/missing-tolerances_topic1561_post6338.html#6338</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=5073">5not4</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 1561<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 18 Feb 2015 at 9:07am<br /><br />Is there a 'typical' tolerance to be used when there is no value given on a datasheet?<div>&nbsp;</div><div>For example - I need to make a footprint for OSCCC style crystal but no dimension is given for the D1 / E1 values (gap between the feet).&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Nominal values are provided for foot width (X and Y)&nbsp;so the gap between&nbsp;can be calculated easily.</div><div><br></div><div>What&nbsp;tolerance should be used for an accurate footprint?</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Any and all comments welcome and greatly appreciated. </div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Datasheet example</div><div><img src="uploads/5073/NX3225_OSCCC.jpg" height="670" width="756" border="0" /></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.PCBLibraries.com/forum/missing-tolerances_topic1561_post6338.html#6338</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>